Synenza
Home/Services/Microsoft 365 & SharePoint

M365 done thoughtfully, not theatrically.

Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Teams, and Viva delivered with the engineering rigour usually reserved for line-of-business systems — and the change story that makes any of it stick.

The quiet productivity layer

Most M365 estates are wildly underbuilt.

M365 is the system most of your people live in, and yet it's the one most often neglected. Teams sprawled, SharePoint sites no one owns, sensitivity labels never applied, and a licence mix nobody can defend.

We treat M365 as serious infrastructure. We architect for governance, model the licence cost honestly, and ship the change programme alongside — because deploying SharePoint isn't the win, getting people off the shared drive is.

What we deliver

Built for the work — not for the deck.

Tenant

Tenant architecture

Identity, conditional access, MFA, device compliance, and the foundational hygiene that makes everything else possible.

SharePoint

SharePoint intranets

Modern SharePoint intranets people actually use — branded, governed, integrated with Viva Connections, and built on a real information architecture.

Teams

Teams governance

Naming, lifecycle, sprawl control, and the M365 group strategy that keeps Teams from becoming the next shared-drive disaster.

Purview

Purview compliance

DLP, sensitivity labels, retention, eDiscovery, and the policy framework that keeps the GC and the CISO out of each other's offices.

Viva

Viva — Insights, Connections, Learning

Viva surfaces deployed for actual outcomes — employee experience that earns its place in the licence stack.

Migration

Migrations & mergers

Tenant-to-tenant, file-share-to-OneDrive, on-prem-to-online, and the M&A scenarios where two tenants must become one with zero data loss.

How we work

A measured, honest path from idea to production.

01

Audit

Two-week audit of identity, security baseline, licence mix, and unmanaged sprawl. Output is one honest report, not a slide deck.

02

Architect

Tenant target state, security baseline, and the information architecture that the intranet and Teams strategy will hang from.

03

Deliver

Phased rollout with measured impact — security hardening first, then SharePoint and Teams, then Viva.

04

Adopt

Champion network, role-based comms, and the lightweight measurement that proves adoption beyond a launch announcement.

Where it lands

Patterns clients keep coming back for.

M365 hardening programme

Microsoft Secure Score uplift from baseline to 80%+, conditional access overhaul, MFA enforcement, and modern auth migration — without breaking everyone's email on Monday.

Intranet replatform

Replacing a legacy intranet with modern SharePoint plus Viva Connections — site architecture, branding, and the content strategy that stops it from rotting.

Tenant consolidation post-M&A

Tenant-to-tenant migrations with zero data loss, identity reconciliation, and the change story that doesn't drop morale during a sensitive period.

Outcomes you can defend

What good looks like.

  • Tenant baseline that passes a Microsoft Security Workshop with no asterisks.
  • Licence mix sized to actual usage and a Copilot value-track in flight.
  • Intranet and Teams estate with named owners and lifecycle policies.
  • Purview controls mapped to your regulatory obligations.
  • Adoption metrics you can publish without flinching.
Frequently asked

The questions clients ask first.

Is Microsoft 365 Copilot worth the spend?
For some roles, yes. For others, not yet. We run a four-week value-track sprint that decides who keeps the licence after the trial period — based on telemetry, not anecdote.
Can you handle a tenant-to-tenant migration after acquisition?
Yes. We've done several. The hard part isn't the data — it's identity, conditional access, and the human change story. We plan for all three.
What about SharePoint Online vs Viva Connections?
They're complementary. Viva Connections sits on top of SharePoint and Teams to deliver the employee-app experience. We deploy them together when the use case calls for it.
How do you keep SharePoint from rotting?
Information architecture, named owners per site, lifecycle policies, and a stewardship rhythm. Most decay is governance debt, not technology debt.

Let's scope a first conversation.

Tell us what you're trying to do. We'll come back with a point of view, not a sales pitch.